Cost & Hygiene Comparison
1. Executive Summary
Touchless commercial faucets are contrasted here to traditional manual faucets in side-by-side comparison, taking into account:
- Hygiene risk
- Water and energy cost
- Maintenance needs
- Total cost of ownership (TCO)
- Real-life tests and video showings
2.Hygiene Impact ⚕️
Manual Faucet Risks
- Direct contact facilitates germ transmission.
- University of Arizona researchers identified 25% of public faucet handles to be positive for a Pseudomonas or fecal bacteria test.
Touchless Faucet Benefits
- Reduces contact with surface.
- Promotes improved hand hygiene compliance.
- Mounted most commonly in high-risk areas such as healthcare and airports.
🔗 Why architects prefer BathSelect touchless
3. Water & Energy Efficiency💧
Comparative Usage
| Fixture Type | Flow Rate | Usage per Wash | Water Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manual | 1.5–2.2 GPM | ~2.0 L | — |
| Touchless | 0.35–0.5 GPM | 1.0–1.2 L | 35–60% |
- Auto-stop sensors prevent wasteful flow.
- FontanaShowers case studies show 35–40% water savings in buildings.
Energy Conservation
- Reduced hot water flow equals reduced heater usage.
- Fontana 2022 study proved ~1860 kWh/month energy savings in hospitals and malls.
🔗 View Fontana cost-savings study
4. Installation & Maintenance 🔧
Manual Faucet Disadvantages
- Wear quickly on handles.
- Leaks, loose handles, frequent replacements typical defects.
Touchless Faucet Advantages
- No handles to crack.
- Brass construction for longevity.
- Battery or hardwired power options.
- Auto-shutoff to avoid long-flow fault.
🔗 Explore BathSelect commercial touchless faucets
5. Cost Analysis: 3-Year TCO
| Cost Category | Manual Tap | Touchless Faucet |
|---|---|---|
| Upfront Cost | $75–$120 | $190–$400 |
| Annual Maintenance | $80–$120 | $20–$50 |
| Water & Energy Cost | $90–$150 | $35–$75 |
| 3-Year Total | ~$555 | ~$390 |
Touchless systems repay your investment. $150+ per unit in three years, even with increased initial cost.
6. Industry Benchmark Studies
- Fontana case study: 35–40% water savings; 60% fewer maintenance tickets; 80%+ increase in hygiene satisfaction.
- Water saving report: Fontana averaged a 35% savings, up to 40% where high use was the situation.
7. Real-World Feedback
- 94% of people actually reported their hygiene to be better.
- 89% said they had greater control over the water (at least, yes).
- 95% of facility managers said maintenance was so much easier—less headache, more chill.
For more detailed statistics:
🔗 BathSelect user survey & cost analysis
8. Video Highlight 🎥
Fontana’s out with their sensor faucet and hand dryer combo on demo. Just what’s needed to minimize touch points, save space, and just make the restroom so much cleaner.
9. Summary Comparison
| Feature | Manual Faucet | Touchless (BathSelect / Fontana) |
|---|---|---|
| Hygiene | Low | High |
| Water Use | High | Low (35–60% saved) |
| Energy Consumption | Higher | Lower |
| Maintenance Effort | High | Low |
| Upfront Cost | Lower | Higher |
| 3‑Year Total Cost | Higher | Lower |
| LEED Certification | No | Eligible |
10. Recommendations
- Place touchless faucets in all high-use areas—yes, restrooms, foodservice, healthcare, etc.
- Select ≤0.5 GPM models if you wish to save as much water as possible.
- Pair those faucets with touchless soap dispensers for the full hygiene package.
- Track usage and maintenance data to make sure that you’re actually experiencing that ROI.
📌 Additional Resources
- FontanaShowers Touchless Faucet Portfolio
- Fontana faucet installation video
- BathSelect installation & spec guide
- BathSelect cost & efficiency analytics
No responses yet